DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,448 entries · root 00bb58334d58
ledger/entry 5760‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
70,038.75 XLM MBODUHRP…AAAAAA
decided in 2.156ms2026-08-04T07:43:22.202Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02mandate scopeop 0 pays MBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, which is not in the allowlist
03velocityclear
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritympp-relay, 0.9s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays MBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, which is not in the allowlist

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
70038.7574105 XLMMBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
memo (not trusted)
invoice be9b11
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 7e21dbdb7a2ebf51 · signed
clock skew
0.9s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
df02ddc52c1858fbc91a61f0e5589676cec9c2bb4f3d73783906df7a3c75a310
transaction
1df440f2b0b2934bf38afaf1d86a00da889bb4d5a8be460f100839c518edc79c

the receipt

entry
5760 of 7448
previous entry
9476e1e0071c43dd3317cbce43d61f17d63f1d612f7e2b7169546251e31b6d8e
leaf hash
008a0bb9615eb3929bb460bcb9793c9d427b71c53cd76afdd54a43143b98fb1a
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
wxe0ck1HkBG1raEQ7sSIyr0GfHILNeIkwEUS/zz7hfXrlGye3M71egPVDGlmPdklCkHdreB+JBxQ3l0VPSL2Dg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 00bb58334d…d2678b
0right8e9071119710a16000…7cadb461be
1right30fad8bf7a15319470…8d799bd39c
2rightea6686bbb75d74590d…3e8c21090f
3rightbc562e55383466d9bf…9e565274da
4rightb758b447cbc6bc0458…121da7b9a8
5right1a3e1759f0cd7909ae…160676b822
6right6aabaf8f67f7caa303…b10ce1e2fe
7left0f1f51934b7f258d16…3d79f3a9a6
8right23c4f0831b90f59516…a26a59256b
9left3fe0d5d17979ce94c0…bd6b56d925
10left120af2267f3c31cbf3…425e6ed072
11right37fc32e3fc5f4cb4cb…e8afcf4f86
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
00bb58334d580d6ebb46a35101c7968413f8d02e8d502c9fb749c779a6d2678b