DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,490 entries · root 963f6ddd7575
ledger/entry 5830‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
447,889.61 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.198ms2026-08-04T09:45:32.334Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02mandate scopeop 0 pays 447889.62, cap is 214961.31
03!velocity447889.62 leaves under 20% of the 1289767.84 window
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritympp-relay, -1.8s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

spend_windowspend_window_near_cap
447889.62 leaves under 20% of the 1289767.84 window
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 447889.62, cap is 214961.31

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
447889.6170601 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice c06387
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce e1020666d87e1664 · signed
clock skew
-1.8s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
d06d1fbee272d84acdae677d2f44116f4fe7d63e753b841eca4be24f44c919c9
transaction
7f03f4fbc9d260c8852c089110de021e46d5bbfef3a79e2b39334358b08bff16

the receipt

entry
5830 of 7490
previous entry
dfce21990922347260dfa5c3a131a06f038a2adfbd73b4ddeba6f0c8a90a302a
leaf hash
040ed1fb6453e9c1089d5dee5c817c8d36fdb0b5f5bde3534a79f2dcfe09610c
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
lcl4phJ6uP4APhBfd+pzC9EQhqNqgPiq52hKfZT7pheEnntQsGHADw/SWxexeD+4wst1tNZBIUqSw3xMGIQJDg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 963f6ddd75…4011d8
0right12a04465a6ce22a4cd…756c5d1ba2
1left1e25c9a655cc6fffec…f57249c3a5
2leftd92d4ddf13949c2dfd…20e9abdf81
3right0efecaa58f9695131a…3f9e5fb4e7
4right0b210b78f3606db2db…0d3d0f41cf
5right0d2db8f4d5ef432138…a3275e9ce9
6left86495863153fd4c9a8…c8c60acadc
7left0f1f51934b7f258d16…3d79f3a9a6
8right23c4f0831b90f59516…a26a59256b
9left3fe0d5d17979ce94c0…bd6b56d925
10left120af2267f3c31cbf3…425e6ed072
11righte44bc1dcaacb055a1d…1f78e62082
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
963f6ddd7575eeb7a031d88825c92c62b925c1be36514eefcc9ac00bca4011d8