DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,341 entries · root 560bf0f5f0d6
ledger/entry 6872‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
49,053.89 USDC tidal bandwidth
decided in 3.242ms2026-08-06T13:15:04.125Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02!mandate scopeop 0 pays 49053.90, above 80% of the 50000.00 cap, human approval required
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritysoroban-direct, -0.3s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritysettle_invoice unchanged since approval

why

mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 49053.90, above 80% of the 50000.00 cap, human approval required

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAZX2QOPWIJMCJLQTTFPKBNKBIS7KRPS5A3TS4UAAAM6XZTMEWBRWWMV
operations
1
op 0 · movement
49053.8976089 USDCGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 00f7de
tool_call (not trusted)
settle_invoice(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
soroban-direct · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 65a4a6fe305131a7 · signed
clock skew
-0.3s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
settle_invoice · 00198884d83611502bb48a12
tool executing
00198884d83611502bb48a12 · unchanged
policy commitment
c39b42efb504654abe017035

provenance

mandate hash
ed67197142edb3f44244f205d12962fdb4f0a93bc58d0d94f3b668240548ecbb
rule hash
c39b42efb504654abe0170359ff9924c5ad2161fca8c4b77c28ba9b173888ad5
request hash
8357508b873523ef759d9348eef0f25a0ceb571806aa1276c01700ef59eb7a0c
transaction
652cbef1ce2867baafd0172733af31280faba077e9d0bcd61dd24b7a54a855ad

the receipt

entry
6872 of 7341
previous entry
a9ffe42e2a6fbe9f36a334b09622813ae7e1e9f0e320bda889b3ea03be0964e6
leaf hash
050dfe9318b759ab41204a43bc13fb1a3e7a26c452fb465a3071bf2d1e0b34be
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
JD20UpjMhF6Adj04RDlfhl7oHfEVzK/eLzTCVzeBXdhY5z5SuyGjhN4cfHOJb0g6+ncGhR9oDfp0i+BehweYBA==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 560bf0f5f0…bb115f
0right8126e82ca58b75a457…f70e7713a3
1right7f8342b639b6a7b3b9…752a2a2387
2right73365bc5f912cbb5e3…a52fef5690
3left2f47581c6fea1c688d…c0b52035d5
4left6fc7034bef3df54fb9…572c28f082
5right9b0dabc56e9d3791d0…ce6169fc73
6leftad4a66150e75485cfd…880872bd02
7leftdd24b7b0c365c182ba…ea9c29ac8b
8right2e9def86dd618400c6…2405603d8f
9left96c0eb2bff9c529bfd…5dcced0eb9
10right24247ebec0c31f8bea…61381a5599
11left4043c82f03366d541c…af7a3fd4fe
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
560bf0f5f0d62ad0ef633bf63bc60afaa05a4ddbd6378798bdf836e783bb115f