DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,284 entries · root f9a7c72151e7
ledger/entry 6987‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
298.39 EURC MA4RCTAG…AAAAAA
decided in 1.215ms2026-08-06T16:30:32.222Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02mandate scopeop 0 pays MA4RCTAG47K3XJVRNUTAT2EWW3IKTAEMOYEIFEFC7HDPNQJ7RJMMZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, which is not in the allowlist
03velocityclear
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integrityx402, -0.5s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays MA4RCTAG47K3XJVRNUTAT2EWW3IKTAEMOYEIFEFC7HDPNQJ7RJMMZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, which is not in the allowlist

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GDXKZXVOUBDH2QH4EQTWMX2BMWR2IQILSMKRVMRNKYSWD3F2IFYQUIH4
operations
1
op 0 · movement
298.3942170 EURCMA4RCTAG47K3XJVRNUTAT2EWW3IKTAEMOYEIFEFC7HDPNQJ7RJMMZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
memo (not trusted)
invoice 50f914
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="dockside freight")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
dockside freight · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
13 days
rail
x402 · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 8bed52878a559a1a · signed
clock skew
-0.5s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · 4d1cb1714f0c4847781cf5a7
tool executing
4d1cb1714f0c4847781cf5a7 · unchanged
policy commitment
7d904c650fc2deb15c054f3e

provenance

mandate hash
58b2171517b0016ad11ce866fd11c328f9e4876ec1c2cb33a8615353fa00c0e6
rule hash
7d904c650fc2deb15c054f3e10016e162564cc0d4379f71a6e0fe0a534c1e9ec
request hash
2031f1afcd55544e0f1f4261427ab3c1573b9f3420469fd2e870a418937fda20
transaction
4e973746eb639f19be79ce436be332f1f4c4624fbdde3a5bb384c5294064d1ce

the receipt

entry
6987 of 7284
previous entry
5bcc6c5e783f5b0cc8e4064f164fc12c775677c267cbd3d05e30ceea6ce2f4f5
leaf hash
0889ca4774bb49330a3065e69c040079efdf9679cd0e0b24a840cc0e1896e68e
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
9tMwuQxT0G7MUm7rqM4h6/BVuCvIq0M/Wt7PIbu26xuo302LTARX906TcICRiP47dw93SUb5RmRZlnnL+9R6AQ==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root f9a7c72151…dc8429
0left5bcc6c5e783f5b0cc8…ea6ce2f4f5
1left6c5362d859a7c213d8…0cef5fdba3
2right4e628f3c74a8f74aaa…56b6bf29f8
3left648114c511ad1ee2bb…81cfdf7d6d
4rightbc9c594ad908aa9f91…d7c1db0ae6
5rightd8675930f1556cf1e4…1df74af60b
6leftf670cdb2bcb5504408…c63821788c
7right75cf0961b6d65e9965…a2392f1f6e
8lefta0356918a6f5923350…e4181e325c
9left96c0eb2bff9c529bfd…5dcced0eb9
10right2024a4cc358ee769f0…1ab33fc068
11left4043c82f03366d541c…af7a3fd4fe
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
f9a7c72151e75fd94870caed2c4b7e417d825b084808288f327ba9325edc8429