DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 8,728 entries · root 2f5a5a0aae0e
ledger/entry 2717‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
15,716.89 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 0.816ms2026-07-26T12:54:55.317Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02·mandate scopenot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
03·velocitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integrityenvelope is -291.5s off, replay window is 60s
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

rail_integrityoutside_replay_window
envelope is -291.5s off, replay window is 60s

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAH5XK7C6S6F7ZRIPPSQSZSJ46QXPYZ42B6BJHHJ3ZSXYD2FBHMNFPPA
operations
1
op 0 · movement
15716.8968425 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 035e94
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce e7551af00c894af3 · signed
clock skew
-291.5s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
8ad1a22e05fea3842fa93b0acc1d5eb83298e06ff488b65ebf2444f49c467723
transaction
4fd46df45708056f3bffc33864f509f6dc793244eff6f75b7f15af188b6cd312

the receipt

entry
2717 of 8728
previous entry
eeb0aa9da0d4ab153c4e6b0ab56891de30a7899540ad064a8c45fb6eacbe4a67
leaf hash
0e2b060c6954dffc5fcb29d7a48836dcfafac98ea537d7ca12b15b7434d8dbe7
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
0Vu1z+TCF6ZBQt4hjnRsilOrwZD6+h1x1hGJfjAxlhMEVs3llLedQ2TELzWq3JsNmKQrKzQgpl8LtYMiEBz2Dg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 2f5a5a0aae…6444dd
0lefteeb0aa9da0d4ab153c…6eacbe4a67
1right4d5bdaaaf99e65733e…fee6f22497
2lefte081b58beadb3a0320…bccc9acfbc
3lefta280d08e215ff22b3c…25e0dc964b
4left8162a5fb9fcfcc27f3…59af014906
5right90888ab0a90433fb5f…0ab12fa528
6right4222d2f25105ac5a70…9248e64a4c
7left7b23e2c4e24f966cea…5ab2de4da5
8rightbd4d9f0271ede98c3c…f686b62b8e
9left2602c3d2391ba4609c…a3f4763fe1
10rightd0305720808f0f38a5…b7c09f13a2
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12right0b5e57bc5146127654…127b54a3f3
13right5cefed22b43d58484a…195c7d1958
root
2f5a5a0aae0e9f56d998ceb68cb29b42580e2c500c1cfeed6314a810a96444dd