DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,874 entries · root 250365db3f73
ledger/entry 3407‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
20,853.99 XLM MBODUHRP…AAAAAA
decided in 1.192ms2026-07-28T15:50:13.510Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02mandate scopeop 0 pays MBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, which is not in the allowlist
03velocityclear
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integrityhorizon-submit, 0.3s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays MBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, which is not in the allowlist

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GA7Y2SGYSBKQNRFY3LO7ON75KAHS5IT5VY36HZPTES267TJXZK66RQ5G
operations
1
op 0 · movement
20853.9992021 XLMMBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
memo (not trusted)
invoice 83a080
tool_call (not trusted)
remit_tax(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
horizon-submit · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 689322349322c0b1 · signed
clock skew
0.3s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
remit_tax · e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853
tool executing
e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853 · unchanged
policy commitment
6058dd02440be2d1f6193e0a

provenance

mandate hash
0e1c128739a05e8c073cba602543a210dcf6c7d1c61b125454590c2688a041ec
rule hash
6058dd02440be2d1f6193e0ad3933111f6bd39563347707855fa880ccb4fa145
request hash
bc3fe1fcbd94d10325c064725c543eb32cf53080d32e4c24505ac835e8e34878
transaction
40a31b7ce39eebf1e6dfc21767c80c61b929ea83a00c5afa75c9e9613569ada2

the receipt

entry
3407 of 7874
previous entry
89548966c0cbeb46352d953d5fc4670ce8434a44b41fca88558598ddc63d95c2
leaf hash
13830351325079f175017fdb1ae7e4073aaf2738fd153bae605def2e86e77129
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
Ti7QsG1M/GYf/3WBJ+jQqQreaaTkKo0IvSzxTOF5M42UoBXYZqveHzmUw7IR86TXLbopnsL+eK5lUsqJ9jzuBg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 250365db3f…fa8c48
0left89548966c0cbeb4635…ddc63d95c2
1left7b48bbe8ec0a720dc3…ef703f6f50
2left4b842ffadff41e192b…ab96819c0b
3left9efb1366283fd8cdb1…073ea41525
4right97adb54f5c64099acb…f7bcd4d986
5right2a423bcf8af2fdf597…28f3d113d1
6left3320dbdfdadb25bdd4…6c3cfa8f01
7right29271aca6ed696ca35…d4f5bb8ea7
8left1688c1e4a32a5083fd…4b7c26e6dc
9rightd455e87f03300cd42e…d51b14eb31
10left5c0713f6dd12def302…5b7f738edd
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12rightded8aa06031e9f9080…472f41f883
root
250365db3f73f70245d4aa807f122ecbf8a46b1c58a69bb2fdd76626a6fa8c48