DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,449 entries · root 4cfda4dccafe
ledger/entry 3602‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
206,509.15 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 3.209ms2026-07-29T11:02:52.736Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02!mandate scopeop 0 pays 206509.15, above 80% of the 214961.31 cap, human approval required
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritympp-relay, -1.6s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritypay_vendor unchanged since approval

why

mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 206509.15, above 80% of the 214961.31 cap, human approval required

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
206509.1543534 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 143c38
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 6893a4b2249d8e74 · signed
clock skew
-1.6s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
558e9c1756f8a4c45a543efad4392ae4ed025ee52a470ed103f1029731be9d35
transaction
e02e977179932884a3022074b84645d2949665b5731bd66017fb39578f94c987

the receipt

entry
3602 of 7449
previous entry
534c9aba5b9c158b6cb517387423d099455ad3cfe0f90b5f8bf0eb593c449aa1
leaf hash
1fb2e1dda32a5289d67a69e9c400957aa4231875416cab46a63cb82c3abfda1f
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
3atzkRQ/odUvrvuLFqyx0p/p4kwV4vOxa9WYjSehfvrFYHgReEPA87Rh61JV2qztIwGyzZAP0y1DgBc+645mAw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 4cfda4dcca…542e8e
0rightafd85b629493c230bb…f7997721f6
1left2d92b3659ee6914bf0…54a79b1011
2righte8e2cab06b4dc844ec…23fa3c8d0d
3righta86e4165426d6add3f…70ab434814
4leftbe3d4ad9e48f0cc648…afdace6c52
5right5f00a5428429015d0b…49efd9244a
6right1920c419c843a1c9cc…0b9749c36c
7right0f3e15ecdf4ef9a1b5…aae3d3293d
8right65cf229241d209b91d…79f338c06b
9left1f8bece408d15a8047…f91777f0e3
10left5c0713f6dd12def302…5b7f738edd
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12right21f02ae2cd2134a73e…e53ac7190e
root
4cfda4dccafee25945efcaee3638e90ed27c35defa38ee05715377db7c542e8e