DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,341 entries · root 560bf0f5f0d6
ledger/entry 6911‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
3,855.81 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.730ms2026-08-06T14:40:12.166Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06!rail integritytransport envelope is unsigned, so its route cannot be proven
07post approval integritypay_vendor unchanged since approval

why

rail_integrityenvelope_unsigned
transport envelope is unsigned, so its route cannot be proven

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GDM7DWHXNMLJGUQLAWJDBBVHIO3A3IJ6EKPUWBGYAK6HHJI6EU3SIEJR
operations
1
op 0 · movement
3855.8199737 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice d89b50
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 009fe6c243d85f44 · unsigned
clock skew
0.4s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
1cd8120f3b04e2161119ec24d444d3141685c69102046e9fe07a8a074bc27334
transaction
26d9a12fb88d38bd935653d47cc3affe4ed9aa217f04ac393bdf1cfc5e9a4128

the receipt

entry
6911 of 7341
previous entry
5ae102ddb32782da53d54fb9b8befbe772133bee74f12c5cb7e0f151cbbf7659
leaf hash
2a8dd36110ea86641dcfe8778610c0b426114677e809d78d3aaa4202f683462e
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
GniErl6e+y3IsflFogKeDAeHhOSd4NNCBOfbPTmssoYtl/TmJ7rDHdeWF0wmYxVGgEuIFoip/yunkYY2lRg/DQ==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 560bf0f5f0…bb115f
0left5ae102ddb32782da53…51cbbf7659
1leftcb29fce2f8daad4772…c086b94206
2left133cd9df937d5b8928…991efc0a45
3leftc637f2709ede9525e7…2c1abfcf6a
4left3fd5b0157ba08f5236…ab92878e98
5left5cdc11b7ba46adbbe8…8c49f77ddf
6leftad4a66150e75485cfd…880872bd02
7leftdd24b7b0c365c182ba…ea9c29ac8b
8right2e9def86dd618400c6…2405603d8f
9left96c0eb2bff9c529bfd…5dcced0eb9
10right24247ebec0c31f8bea…61381a5599
11left4043c82f03366d541c…af7a3fd4fe
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
560bf0f5f0d62ad0ef633bf63bc60afaa05a4ddbd6378798bdf836e783bb115f