DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,404 entries · root 03c79c2f42ca
ledger/entry 3373‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
147,578.81 XLM pixel foundry
decided in 1.398ms2026-07-28T14:44:36.128Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02·mandate scopenot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
03·velocitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritydelivered over mpp-relay, the mandate names horizon-submit
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

rail_integrityrail_hop_mismatch
delivered over mpp-relay, the mandate names horizon-submit

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GCJCW6F2LQNESISSOWIKYSG5OBLBQS6GAZ4W2K2TZLZ36UD43BKDBHYP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
147578.8149511 XLMGAI32BDAUBEHV7QNDFUCCPAF3MJSIJ7GE4WV2DVK3QJXQDBZUNUJ7GJ6
memo (not trusted)
invoice e4149b
tool_call (not trusted)
settle_invoice(vendor="pixel foundry")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
pixel foundry · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
209 days
rail
mpp-relay · mandate names horizon-submit
envelope
nonce e420f74107d019c4 · signed
clock skew
1.6s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
settle_invoice · cf8afbea802e68958853cc09
tool executing
cf8afbea802e68958853cc09 · unchanged
policy commitment
666fffa405f3422198fd9451

provenance

mandate hash
62054781513a89f3a21a0a59406754dbe61fba9c570cf7a9e437c93e2b2292f5
rule hash
666fffa405f3422198fd9451df1674b17ec570e17de6c136b287abe831f35e8d
request hash
f7dea9b513d507e8f1a520cc4c5c7fff7954d5a9a63dadae52a35af73009cb1d
transaction
75fddece478c831d03e4a42cc124daba3904f5ab9ec392b7cc7b53f8017a1ce4

the receipt

entry
3373 of 7404
previous entry
a899a6f991b27d5ad15d26de04cdd042595828ef2bd588c77bec1187bdaa6a4d
leaf hash
2e92593cb9761e7c11d21e4ae8875f6fb1ebade844ab05cd75a4c71a042f1eab
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
Jua+5Gu7DCrH+hIcRQWW3HaUsqubPUKb89BCkfz1Lcycuh0rUn/VQCp27r2ZLVda/ghP68gQGSkVDHGDJ5EtCw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 03c79c2f42…8ff52b
0lefta899a6f991b27d5ad1…87bdaa6a4d
1rightff358dc457c94c8677…938c5862d2
2left8c1ab2205ef2ec273a…1828eb8b4d
3left24a79fc3f9d7298e46…0bb551e241
4right5815e5bc36584d0802…bf9a512f76
5left825392cf8cf0133ebe…602570af54
6right6d8cfd4edfd108498b…64e6b4d46e
7right29271aca6ed696ca35…d4f5bb8ea7
8left1688c1e4a32a5083fd…4b7c26e6dc
9rightd455e87f03300cd42e…d51b14eb31
10left5c0713f6dd12def302…5b7f738edd
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12right282bf333122a3f260e…dbd57f725a
root
03c79c2f42ca9255de2536781df0b75d1aaa59b2e3ec0ffb772f49bf0a8ff52b