DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,341 entries · root 560bf0f5f0d6
ledger/entry 5673‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
3,598.89 USDC tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.633ms2026-08-03T19:51:05.531Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityexpected exactly 1 movement, found 2
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integrityhorizon-submit, -0.9s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

realitymultiple_operations
expected exactly 1 movement, found 2
realitysigner_added
op 1 adds signer GCUBG5EIAV5K… with weight 255

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAPTG22HH2Q7G6JYZKIJDCWGI5VNP7SPOS6CCHISM5HSM536M3EQXWDE
operations
2
op 0 · movement
3598.8906309 USDCGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
op 1 · state change
adds signer GCUBG5EIAV5K… with weight 255
memo (not trusted)
invoice 3c579f
tool_call (not trusted)
issue_refund(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
horizon-submit · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 7eba5626f245a999 · signed
clock skew
-0.9s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
issue_refund · af00cb44f0a0615b89ae21a5
tool executing
af00cb44f0a0615b89ae21a5 · unchanged
policy commitment
feaf0619f08a7e6d9de5189f

provenance

mandate hash
3363a48df38810d7f94266841f5ce9f6943260404031d19f83037ec980296e64
rule hash
feaf0619f08a7e6d9de5189fc4ec6f962d2e71afb0d5df79161417ea73fe17b5
request hash
9a8cc5d62f9b1343a94bb6f6b6f6535f17b327c34330c321866387b000eab18f
transaction
f441636400077cf7c2f55814808fd84dc7c22ddef16e3ae1c7ac5f696de99106

the receipt

entry
5673 of 7341
previous entry
6d306557955767d53f95cdaa4908aa8c90a5f549819a725c4fd03876551cca6b
leaf hash
300dbbbb972d6bcc02334a326a09fdcc42a0681ec440f5e96a71c215a689d2e1
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
bvorgey8gRS3zl/hjY9ZV2YWNqWwxD8WhJtFlwbe9bbbQt8UCacV2+F3TePsXGvxEmvEvIspY4KAYqipUYEEDw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 560bf0f5f0…bb115f
0left6d306557955767d53f…76551cca6b
1right6e77f98f2e2abac385…e3b7d9627b
2rightc6fd51232758a8e094…927ce11437
3leftbeb30d5da3ebbcbad4…694eeb28ce
4right1d6220e82bbbc5f67f…900b4feb20
5lefta99d47c3d505da7812…28fe1faff5
6right836b6e25c08d699e08…cd1ddfb9f6
7right5cfacfeb6960aa5e16…21a087e24f
8right23c4f0831b90f59516…a26a59256b
9left3fe0d5d17979ce94c0…bd6b56d925
10left120af2267f3c31cbf3…425e6ed072
11rightb29c24f63a25899d26…21a3d78898
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
560bf0f5f0d62ad0ef633bf63bc60afaa05a4ddbd6378798bdf836e783bb115f