DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 8,761 entries · root 13dae7b9f3cd
ledger/entry 2498‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
207,225.14 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 2.331ms2026-07-25T14:19:55.421Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02!mandate scopeop 0 pays 207225.14, above 80% of the 214961.31 cap, human approval required
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritympp-relay, -1.2s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritypay_vendor unchanged since approval

why

mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 207225.14, above 80% of the 214961.31 cap, human approval required

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAH5XK7C6S6F7ZRIPPSQSZSJ46QXPYZ42B6BJHHJ3ZSXYD2FBHMNFPPA
operations
1
op 0 · movement
207225.1422528 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice aeaf87
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce b6b5e7b7d911902f · signed
clock skew
-1.2s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
9442c641fa1ad36dc6b59120f708c9b7df5317f2305ccf649934a99696c37f46
transaction
8618de47d9d34e6bc33fe8c57cdb3b53d7b9a5bf975442983a3767cb6204b187

the receipt

entry
2498 of 8761
previous entry
c13fefb537003116578c11c1eee2fc6cbe5fa502767265aa1e9fe3026ba65156
leaf hash
34493c5e4daa88d73485eda1152527e3f70002555894bdd62568fdc52628b9cd
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
ghI3SVjHhdMRjpnC4GZTR3Ma8jYWowa8kxYJ24BaRIpRaxycOXwMA7Ggy7751uXBP46BvKGhDmYPnkHng59RCA==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 13dae7b9f3…c87cfe
0right87733df02aac0d3e92…7eba462b1a
1leftfe1afce577fdf58685…f1fa109eb5
2rightab4b3e3b2a1a06a6df…5fc092e8ce
3right22b9ee4ddad12f9eb8…616c4bbb95
4rightf2fd20204d1ee3127a…9f3772c6d0
5right114fa16369bba603ea…0b54984b85
6left72b6401e0cc152c6a1…787397c1cb
7left72ef2d9386f1e7eb75…05d567c848
8leftaabda09cb1f348fd11…e260f45846
9righte799ad94e5ec8f5b18…1eb984ac76
10rightd0305720808f0f38a5…b7c09f13a2
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12right0b5e57bc5146127654…127b54a3f3
13right34ce1382d13b7b1600…98a96428de
root
13dae7b9f3cdc3f41b48c83a6d57235244f45029863c3142fc3cefa915c87cfe