DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,286 entries · root bf55c0bdeb46
ledger/entry 7088‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
468,320.01 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.283ms2026-08-06T19:05:08.743Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02mandate scopeop 0 pays 468320.02, cap is 214961.31
03!velocity468320.02 leaves under 20% of the 1289767.84 window
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritympp-relay, 0.9s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

spend_windowspend_window_near_cap
468320.02 leaves under 20% of the 1289767.84 window
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 468320.02, cap is 214961.31

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GB53TML6EYC4CISOPMWAYG33FMSG5MFTHOVGYVLY5M7UCCM5RLMYBNXF
operations
1
op 0 · movement
468320.0177795 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 32d620
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce b997d6e15524dd4c · signed
clock skew
0.9s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
ac83eb9fd60fb468b0443cd7dbdc4863c0daf7c83109f7c2cc59cc6eee7c3846
transaction
cda70a44d11b4c5410a2038cab8ce44d71b7c99dfaa3f34054981c81976fad1d

the receipt

entry
7088 of 7286
previous entry
85ca84b7997b1682f30575fd2fba35661d0c09e8eb0f283493066faf27752365
leaf hash
4a53add8c6d2c339c0068eb1ffb7756598aac7032ef77f2821d883c1faa09f63
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
Srp7kzVfz67Zu8DYPAZoM+EV6Iw7XeyDVNlFZn/DtKOJhxbJSFRn6zEIvQJaDFfS3/irKtLuN4elzBbdHCluDA==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root bf55c0bdeb…93e463
0rightfa8fc5156fa861b112…a3a1bfd069
1right495dfc3ff153f4deef…4c126cd557
2rightb40f54648843f53bc9…b50ad907b1
3right3cb7f00f52b6c0b113…1ae8912abd
4left3ac01047d5599ab699…2d1ba73132
5left3c0c792ece0a357335…508bd84912
6right45af1c85024f13f6f8…4800952ede
7left24508aa536d103d423…3bc3fa6d40
8lefta0356918a6f5923350…e4181e325c
9left96c0eb2bff9c529bfd…5dcced0eb9
10rightd67c14488b492cb5b6…7424e00efe
11left4043c82f03366d541c…af7a3fd4fe
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
bf55c0bdeb46060a76bd1b0389db4397548183c2634f6ec09d44facaa893e463