DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,411 entries · root 3cf8d092d3e2
ledger/entry 5623‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
202,782.43 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.939ms2026-08-03T17:41:50.607Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02!mandate scopeop 0 pays 202782.44, above 80% of the 214961.31 cap, human approval required
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritympp-relay, -0.6s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritypay_vendor unchanged since approval

why

mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 202782.44, above 80% of the 214961.31 cap, human approval required

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
202782.4358880 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice fd0f15
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce ba7495dd4c2193ab · signed
clock skew
-0.6s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
e11b6ea63fbac294e12cb8f2c638aa7734f6ff51253264e45b36e1042ffabff4
transaction
ac7dde8336b4f7c449ec6f0be5c275366a7b227c8dff49240a024ef28b7349ba

the receipt

entry
5623 of 7411
previous entry
bad07c3dd6edf613c83e2e431e0ebd33707709e8591e8e18153e73955b306686
leaf hash
510aa710ee8cbf68196753c27a5e1df84bb6b4ea19b216adeb913af1880c4fa5
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
D7hRm0VZz9yR+dN2qhxUmYcldlVqmUe6kV9OOov1vfZYCoaiU6bAxCDAzSJKpJ1s3Y+CYinVp4xAGA6chLDcCA==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 3cf8d092d3…6f96b0
0leftbad07c3dd6edf613c8…955b306686
1left45caa8ed18bce86bc0…8bc7815f30
2leftd2311d15de8b4619bc…2ddb7f1874
3right9e86ef8e5093e93092…d3cc3e4cb8
4lefta684366d9a8f11717b…25b4b390cb
5leftd5fb4ef6cb1d1c3fe6…b042b5e622
6left16421deb9d7b44283f…34b855b691
7leftcf832b259177631891…51131d8cfd
8left4457566ed7240b9466…543dd4c1ea
9rightc1ee5dcce64b8e468a…839a1d2c47
10left120af2267f3c31cbf3…425e6ed072
11right145dfd2d4b928e4263…c4f9a6a7df
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
3cf8d092d3e2ffc8abd2ab26c8eaecb767bc22ccdcd20d476f7c5250e46f96b0