DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,405 entries · root 6f8ee48c82e9
ledger/entry 4692‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
24,074.20 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 0.697ms2026-08-01T10:38:16.349Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02·mandate scopenot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
03·velocitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritydelivered over horizon-submit, the mandate names mpp-relay
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

rail_integrityrail_hop_mismatch
delivered over horizon-submit, the mandate names mpp-relay

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
24074.2099213 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 98a090
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
horizon-submit · mandate names mpp-relay
envelope
nonce 5d412dcfe0c85dc5 · signed
clock skew
1.0s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
6b59ab7694fea4ff8647d31e29af6f0c304004af73b70179ce3cb251b43a6054
transaction
8cd1c2a1af90dd7496490f770dbbcde4449d4eba10791d88e7f2aaae60d7bf1c

the receipt

entry
4692 of 7405
previous entry
7672929b3df7c7299738a73e7cf265fc00cc8193c1c8c7ec60b06b28d632f681
leaf hash
53f73298db0c018dfb26d7942b4b0b417be616ef0c6ecbcb11366b1c771bf6c3
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
NKQf6vskzCclUm+wtBedjN8Z8ZQ9B/zI6tuPxH86S4QYcGCK2a4rKAUQxjxYHKo4l6xDL8zLXyaxOJILWRx+Cg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 6f8ee48c82…1af8c8
0right031be7105b147df6bb…4f87b24233
1right272636af0f14bfca85…2eb6149c60
2lefteecc28d4e26895bcbc…b925d27db0
3right35a4db607e84b9fec2…8103b85999
4left25c0475b285b30069f…7bdeb39a72
5right26b18594cab304e165…1e03463fbf
6lefte724e5d59f6bdc3d8f…255aa4c106
7rightcc9a222bfb3ac40cc5…dd0cf81745
8rightf4014cf557446bb624…43642a4211
9left5efccc17def2020d29…64ff5d7d00
10right78d79e50c934cffc8b…2cef11de30
11right275009688c837f7a63…a3140419e2
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
6f8ee48c82e9d284b40730187bcb49c9c9d4acb56f1afef38efe61446e1af8c8