DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,496 entries · root 88692cb15875
ledger/entry 4861‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
3,686.57 USDC tidal bandwidth
decided in 3.044ms2026-08-01T18:25:35.518Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityexpected exactly 1 movement, found 4
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritysoroban-direct, 1.7s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

realitymultiple_operations
expected exactly 1 movement, found 4

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAO7VSWNNZZQWYUNNSUJXO6FWEHC5VLUGDWAEOOWG5DRYYY56Q2Q52LZ
operations
4
op 0 · movement
3686.5774422 USDCGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
op 1 · movement
921.6443605 USDCGAJPJ4LEUZBCG6WF76DJIFUQT5F4FJV6LPVBUMKHJ7VZ6RUBEPJYJZRB
op 2 · movement
921.6443605 USDCGCEOWOKPP2NHGJACBKTQPG5PIJ24QKBOYOTCSS2YSLVBWBAHCH6IT7HJ
op 3 · movement
921.6443605 USDCGB6IZ3SC73HZGYDTE3JYDNRV27U5SGQYNCAHBHRUMMYHJG4YYKEQTCYN
memo (not trusted)
invoice 43968e
tool_call (not trusted)
settle_invoice(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
soroban-direct · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 5fb036450d0a6be9 · signed
clock skew
1.7s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
settle_invoice · 00198884d83611502bb48a12
tool executing
00198884d83611502bb48a12 · unchanged
policy commitment
c39b42efb504654abe017035

provenance

mandate hash
ed67197142edb3f44244f205d12962fdb4f0a93bc58d0d94f3b668240548ecbb
rule hash
c39b42efb504654abe0170359ff9924c5ad2161fca8c4b77c28ba9b173888ad5
request hash
1d1d9feee767382772ca8f519f1f8217e0ce8e6967ba5daa911ed8b6f666336a
transaction
c3bf95c0579bbac848b44fad147b00f90a22ceb7e7e22034c927a349177455b5

the receipt

entry
4861 of 7496
previous entry
34525f169db2d4d4ce17475da9363531ae3704984ecfe9b03b6ae8e6273758e4
leaf hash
59bceb2d195bd85091b7b53995a856bd556bb31ca10496c00810dee41113565b
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
5SPefYKJgE4cl0HgeO0d/Rp/fNWEQjtw3xEiJrhbPfaeiDcvGLP8dqQMyvBFdFuRn9gJPprhS14SBi09OX3YAQ==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 88692cb158…795bec
0left34525f169db2d4d4ce…e6273758e4
1rightfdf1b6cc909eb4f3de…bcf7f9ebf1
2leftb1e942d9c1476e7d34…42b57095c3
3left8a937f83a2aace2823…b5c4989bb3
4lefta29b64c0daedc79c53…0c2764722c
5left6024af3aaa5068adf1…93537bb180
6left8e0f7cfd5823fe2e22…422736987e
7left8ff71191901628c93a…62d334e864
8rightf4014cf557446bb624…43642a4211
9left5efccc17def2020d29…64ff5d7d00
10right78d79e50c934cffc8b…2cef11de30
11right5538d944b142b39842…5893ce9885
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
88692cb158753c608c6672ce241cf4ce70532f6fc3c4a06a3322e7698a795bec