DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,753 entries · root 41ba53e24eda
ledger/entry 3945‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
746.55 USDC self-custody drain
decided in 0.708ms2026-07-30T09:08:11.962Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02mandate scopeop 0 pays GCBKGSPBC2LNE7PG74Y3ZV4VLTW2V2B4KX5TRABJ4VUEJQRPIGRNYDYN, which is not in the allowlist
03velocityclear
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integrityhorizon-submit, -1.0s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCBKGSPBC2LNE7PG74Y3ZV4VLTW2V2B4KX5TRABJ4VUEJQRPIGRNYDYN, which is not in the allowlist

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAPTG22HH2Q7G6JYZKIJDCWGI5VNP7SPOS6CCHISM5HSM536M3EQXWDE
operations
1
op 0 · movement
746.5505485 USDCGCBKGSPBC2LNE7PG74Y3ZV4VLTW2V2B4KX5TRABJ4VUEJQRPIGRNYDYN
memo (not trusted)
invoice 40146a
tool_call (not trusted)
issue_refund(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
self-custody drain · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
30 days
rail
horizon-submit · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 2d397efd5141e318 · signed
clock skew
-1.0s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
issue_refund · af00cb44f0a0615b89ae21a5
tool executing
af00cb44f0a0615b89ae21a5 · unchanged
policy commitment
feaf0619f08a7e6d9de5189f

provenance

mandate hash
3363a48df38810d7f94266841f5ce9f6943260404031d19f83037ec980296e64
rule hash
feaf0619f08a7e6d9de5189fc4ec6f962d2e71afb0d5df79161417ea73fe17b5
request hash
82246f45b6188c87c1be56c33e2f68caa4e40f694257a7406b1336d3e9b2a5b2
transaction
da28fd4a3d4cea050cbe10c4cd9b8f5153eedb1063b03acd6caf98e84f81fa08

the receipt

entry
3945 of 7753
previous entry
df08ecb8c8d0fe0e8d110cf1dc66235a45a357c395443b68c45b320e57449376
leaf hash
61509c25558e49a377ffd8cc70db5277b09a459427b96ff493658fa4535d6a4a
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
Wbq+/4GsTTU8a/Zu37UMvZTky08FjORm9UBDjtKXQZ5+nQ9lw10fITjL+fGibXcncUV1gWlIFZ3e5Jz6gfQDBQ==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 41ba53e24e…9e9d2d
0leftdf08ecb8c8d0fe0e8d…0e57449376
1righta77e12b06bf7a73479…cbae8917ee
2right9196d78f1b96dc9415…1414a06745
3left741e50f5fbdb57822a…92d7c70888
4rightff59895232f2312c0c…37aa07c6e2
5leftcf99204246788d9ce7…ed899d5905
6left645738fcda46eccb96…87c433936e
7right38df458c4668a6ad01…4d683ae987
8left29c454556c69d47a2a…2632854b0d
9left1f8bece408d15a8047…f91777f0e3
10left5c0713f6dd12def302…5b7f738edd
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12right2df20469d52c14b328…224d75ad36
root
41ba53e24edaccda7d56f79b2e6f026de43465b45c893bf92f7f8914ed9e9d2d