DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 9,009 entries · root 9e40eae6b658
ledger/entry 3635‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
16,499.59 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 0.852ms2026-07-29T12:10:01.804Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02·mandate scopenot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
03velocityagt_cloud-spend_1ec0 made 7 requests inside 60s, limit is 5
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritympp-relay, 0.9s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

velocityvelocity_exceeded
agt_cloud-spend_1ec0 made 7 requests inside 60s, limit is 5

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAH5XK7C6S6F7ZRIPPSQSZSJ46QXPYZ42B6BJHHJ3ZSXYD2FBHMNFPPA
operations
1
op 0 · movement
16499.5977087 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 01e4e3
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 74df1d5bbeda620e · signed
clock skew
0.9s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
24ec1feb9eae9bb1bf34339cdc03c9d497d84264f807748ae5f3c46ca9b90352
transaction
b693d78dd2699064befca1620673cb9ce448f258d7890a2eb182d68ddcaa893d

the receipt

entry
3635 of 9009
previous entry
f8fcc9f0a348465e26fbe1527e642b1e0421e68f759f0c86618fc0c96541a5a7
leaf hash
6b2337f4006d277c209a16e9ff99d3a8a003ed85f9aa63a58f645d6b29d52199
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
irA8t/QXye7w4z/zt32pWTX5xE4G8qlqPJ+BCyiYYRx1mIg2N2NdGluMcipEIuh+J/EAleet8jv5XWkrSivtBg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 9e40eae6b6…872815
0leftf8fcc9f0a348465e26…c96541a5a7
1left1ad069db0f3e8e86aa…1548acd8ab
2right2a9c54ae9ac3427864…b2f474be0a
3right1493b7ada56b440ba4…6fd73613f5
4lefta98f1da4f83bcd646f…9f74d9f0f3
5left3d39acb1b481c740e1…3abf1990dc
6right1920c419c843a1c9cc…0b9749c36c
7right0f3e15ecdf4ef9a1b5…aae3d3293d
8right65cf229241d209b91d…79f338c06b
9left1f8bece408d15a8047…f91777f0e3
10left5c0713f6dd12def302…5b7f738edd
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12right0b5e57bc5146127654…127b54a3f3
13right307f54c8e85db8cc07…d5aa2d3d2f
root
9e40eae6b6589bb3a9f49af209a10409a0903a061adfaa08a6cfe2d06c872815