DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,621 entries · root f0ad35468351
ledger/entry 4579‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
17,272.92 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 2.967ms2026-07-31T21:47:58.029Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04!counterpartydestination was first seen under 24h ago and has no payment history
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritympp-relay, 0.7s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritypay_vendor unchanged since approval

why

counterpartycounterparty_first_seen
destination was first seen under 24h ago and has no payment history

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GDM7DWHXNMLJGUQLAWJDBBVHIO3A3IJ6EKPUWBGYAK6HHJI6EU3SIEJR
operations
1
op 0 · movement
17272.9225120 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 7df1b8
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
first seen under 24h ago
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce c2b2595b19b3d83e · signed
clock skew
0.7s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
66ec693698eb9aff31e4645af9d7008248404309f8f585f863a60ddd397ed3b7
transaction
07bdec29dd7ec291db244567b802058f20f258200edcb24bcdb33ba417fc6115

the receipt

entry
4579 of 7621
previous entry
70f5d9e046a7b7609e6c8b41bf8bdbf0e7cd209c169692cb46b5d33af3beadaa
leaf hash
75ae51d20dfc60ba4dacc797e137f4c83b62332810318941c020558aa23f4634
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
o/nIfprXWeAcAf677Z/MJU9EZi7E6kyD10zHnEPSm00QtLaZvTLvfRlWcs3qpPN09qk/vZtrBAtqjDZXC1lECg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root f0ad354683…3d3b8f
0left70f5d9e046a7b7609e…3af3beadaa
1lefta0a1e64c32bc264287…7ccc6f56f9
2right6b327c0d166f2c79e2…f548d37282
3right1f2bd9cb6463b3de50…6ae69a3972
4rightc41bb53d36fce25153…bf647dfec4
5lefte3842dde0a6528a78d…49135d850f
6leftbfea747cbce68a2344…cb14b69e36
7leftdaee7ac1aefaa3c4ee…1a78985402
8left4e4bc411d7266f864e…35a4b2046e
9rightcceadbe3aa211130c6…9fbf263854
10right78d79e50c934cffc8b…2cef11de30
11right5261930fe6830ed69e…3401bf8ecd
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
f0ad35468351b3b3134b00deeba8f76ee10c3722eb70a008450e40d0aa3d3b8f