DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,413 entries · root fbd6a013f945
ledger/entry 5083‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
4,139.47 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 3.083ms2026-08-02T11:53:58.844Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integrityhorizon-submit, -0.0s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integrityon-chain policy commits to 774a1e5c67d5…, this rule hashes to 6058dd02440b…

why

post_approval_integritypolicy_commitment_mismatch
on-chain policy commits to 774a1e5c67d5…, this rule hashes to 6058dd02440b…

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GA7Y2SGYSBKQNRFY3LO7ON75KAHS5IT5VY36HZPTES267TJXZK66RQ5G
operations
1
op 0 · movement
4139.4737775 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 311615
tool_call (not trusted)
remit_tax(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
horizon-submit · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 29f560eb4d10e10f · signed
clock skew
-0.0s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
remit_tax · e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853
tool executing
e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853 · unchanged
policy commitment
774a1e5c67d5a92b389309b5

provenance

mandate hash
0e1c128739a05e8c073cba602543a210dcf6c7d1c61b125454590c2688a041ec
rule hash
6058dd02440be2d1f6193e0ad3933111f6bd39563347707855fa880ccb4fa145
request hash
1410a971b8b3245e4c2f605391fd955675e2d355c3082447035cd44a814dd709
transaction
163c3d84b9f784bb3e85f3c23bfd4fa68e4da851030eb393c0b716f332af8193

the receipt

entry
5083 of 7413
previous entry
6e6ba622631dd181ba45ee983ef3b57cf2e6e81adb831c54132a33c3039a8a77
leaf hash
7741c6e93271c7516dc3e1eb7d25b4deaf0deb4f7a7c7a57b7cd7041fe52b24a
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
OdFe7QC1DdZeVo7Ukur+NhqiZoc0lvETGWO0UhBw08KjvEQJWc/DCae5LmSPMLAMhSLIj3LFCTuBsaSzIToCDA==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root fbd6a013f9…e35f75
0left6e6ba622631dd181ba…c3039a8a77
1left39ba59b69f986f7382…7cf5e7ffed
2right6acad87420b0a335a8…4a2f67261f
3leftb35daf1ec41da8db63…0751955e1f
4leftd1bb441bf60776f61d…293264f429
5right36dc34ce0dacf8bc58…01efff429c
6left714610ebaeb03b5a75…41bba3b960
7left79f7450aea35c41d62…5e9e49deb3
8leftaf2867073a354f4d40…d7f24e6c47
9left5efccc17def2020d29…64ff5d7d00
10right78d79e50c934cffc8b…2cef11de30
11right2bc979ad9c7b7fd2ea…5d354bb584
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
fbd6a013f9451a6efc3f8d070c76ea426140c50805da001491e0a0d810e35f75