DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,341 entries · root 560bf0f5f0d6
ledger/entry 6085‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
15,387.31 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 0.796ms2026-08-04T16:58:37.564Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02·mandate scopenot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
03·velocitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritydelivered over mpp-relay, the mandate names horizon-submit
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

rail_integrityrail_hop_mismatch
delivered over mpp-relay, the mandate names horizon-submit

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GBGUDCQEKH5I6P6USB5PS3374RIKG5R5RAP57MXEYLOR7JG4TJIENBAI
operations
1
op 0 · movement
15387.3194123 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice ad8b1d
tool_call (not trusted)
remit_tax(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · mandate names horizon-submit
envelope
nonce 25bf0b37e0ca20f5 · signed
clock skew
0.7s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
remit_tax · e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853
tool executing
e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853 · unchanged
policy commitment
6058dd02440be2d1f6193e0a

provenance

mandate hash
0e1c128739a05e8c073cba602543a210dcf6c7d1c61b125454590c2688a041ec
rule hash
6058dd02440be2d1f6193e0ad3933111f6bd39563347707855fa880ccb4fa145
request hash
1e7772dfa75a03a7cdbe8b2038f399d953acfa65a6d9f505ea2267677011eac2
transaction
eb6d86111a117209daffd5f6c88cc77e18f563d22d4a78c845d57110873e73fa

the receipt

entry
6085 of 7341
previous entry
f08848de858114511b4c814cc86e5546865fb5375b373939cba7fa0d98ac577b
leaf hash
801a7f6ae961692207635cdcb03303cd10648b9fa8b436d196fcc1c7c5665be6
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
BQ9s8smuNJ4v74qzA/I21dt7+NGXJZBwsJfTZA4/BgY/f/co8d7C6B8TBaaizBQzmNoZzr7uhY/97TqRbd3jBw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 560bf0f5f0…bb115f
0leftf08848de858114511b…0d98ac577b
1right82689002133cbeea29…38457e69a4
2left004071ced92bd21c11…97dbea8c34
3right06f1710b8609a07959…b5fba7747a
4rightc1cd3fb001042987cc…52ca510fbb
5right0472515befc561f07a…59e6edb021
6left962675081f0a3f603e…886f047d8a
7left5932c619752e887b10…eff94faaac
8left602b53294959c78e65…8fc8212342
9left3fe0d5d17979ce94c0…bd6b56d925
10left120af2267f3c31cbf3…425e6ed072
11rightb29c24f63a25899d26…21a3d78898
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
560bf0f5f0d62ad0ef633bf63bc60afaa05a4ddbd6378798bdf836e783bb115f