DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,448 entries · root 00bb58334d58
ledger/entry 4601‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
44,958.38 USDC tidal bandwidth
decided in 0.925ms2026-08-01T01:51:40.287Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02!mandate scopeop 0 pays 44958.38, above 80% of the 50000.00 cap, human approval required
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritysoroban-direct, -1.7s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritysettle_invoice unchanged since approval

why

mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 44958.38, above 80% of the 50000.00 cap, human approval required

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAO7VSWNNZZQWYUNNSUJXO6FWEHC5VLUGDWAEOOWG5DRYYY56Q2Q52LZ
operations
1
op 0 · movement
44958.3813149 USDCGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice c712b9
tool_call (not trusted)
settle_invoice(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
soroban-direct · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 3dea6ba76ad59168 · signed
clock skew
-1.7s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
settle_invoice · 00198884d83611502bb48a12
tool executing
00198884d83611502bb48a12 · unchanged
policy commitment
c39b42efb504654abe017035

provenance

mandate hash
ed67197142edb3f44244f205d12962fdb4f0a93bc58d0d94f3b668240548ecbb
rule hash
c39b42efb504654abe0170359ff9924c5ad2161fca8c4b77c28ba9b173888ad5
request hash
f9525b60e5ea2da1bdf664d1f22a233a9584f3f20c78b03506994e5c5cd5afe9
transaction
fc6e57d2e6dfd209ad2ef2811cd9e218c44264bf10b8a850a25394e1dc5f4358

the receipt

entry
4601 of 7448
previous entry
171d7b71345bfcc122eb320f76642738ebc0204b5a7a840363a1ff8aec4b0740
leaf hash
9b69e6246bed09cdfe611175a6ad8be186e77c69c15e425f4ce9fb00efdd2718
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
UMv3mtCqo/B12nAtHQX9vmdLjMmNn+uV1etyytr9UrXQpCI5/2qvXTEBMEM+6dRKg9/oka/MlJVxE6VyLgabBQ==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 00bb58334d…d2678b
0left171d7b71345bfcc122…8aec4b0740
1right911630803e73ce4c89…7c8b71cfd8
2right00759c86a913160cbc…74aa3464d0
3left27357260a2f7274d38…a927b920a8
4left6754cdf520da5cad17…b07f0d89da
5lefte3842dde0a6528a78d…49135d850f
6leftbfea747cbce68a2344…cb14b69e36
7leftdaee7ac1aefaa3c4ee…1a78985402
8left4e4bc411d7266f864e…35a4b2046e
9rightcceadbe3aa211130c6…9fbf263854
10right78d79e50c934cffc8b…2cef11de30
11right37fc32e3fc5f4cb4cb…e8afcf4f86
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
00bb58334d580d6ebb46a35101c7968413f8d02e8d502c9fb749c779a6d2678b