DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,404 entries · root 03c79c2f42ca
ledger/entry 5664‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
49,065.42 USDC tidal bandwidth
decided in 2.552ms2026-08-03T18:56:32.956Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02!mandate scopeop 0 pays 49065.43, above 80% of the 50000.00 cap, human approval required
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritysoroban-direct, -0.6s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritysettle_invoice unchanged since approval

why

mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 49065.43, above 80% of the 50000.00 cap, human approval required

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GBVRQDCFBZU4Z3ZR4UPAV23TRAODTXS5YXPO3VYO7EK2LK347WUOSLBU
operations
1
op 0 · movement
49065.4297640 USDCGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice ea781b
tool_call (not trusted)
settle_invoice(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
soroban-direct · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce f25076796c23bde8 · signed
clock skew
-0.6s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
settle_invoice · 00198884d83611502bb48a12
tool executing
00198884d83611502bb48a12 · unchanged
policy commitment
c39b42efb504654abe017035

provenance

mandate hash
ed67197142edb3f44244f205d12962fdb4f0a93bc58d0d94f3b668240548ecbb
rule hash
c39b42efb504654abe0170359ff9924c5ad2161fca8c4b77c28ba9b173888ad5
request hash
1a87e781b6e8eabadf578192e3572ffefda61b3fbed2650ea9d3bd9145c10bf7
transaction
f0dfd272c70ac0d74e0d2d204295c5b4fbac8664ec2c1b8b0d075d670d42f735

the receipt

entry
5664 of 7404
previous entry
f0ee34cb52942921477e9cf10619bd8951e893f65a9cdf298ac4f27ba4a4892f
leaf hash
9ef4ccffe44958804cfa3d82ee7d5fd9c9dc62c610319a19eafbf04ab37b43ab
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
eKBYCao8Ziig+DNP3iZk2oyQe9sgBRHtMGyXY3EssZrpDM2gkqANv+gvG582Ty+XiGmYym8jV6+t5L3rOtNWBw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 03c79c2f42…8ff52b
0rightb703ac237df70fbd3a…ad771b3a96
1rightd9656c6472759b48bb…6900641779
2righta269dde0608c5874bb…3e76b968b6
3right045176aae99764ceec…6aea5cfd4b
4right1d6220e82bbbc5f67f…900b4feb20
5lefta99d47c3d505da7812…28fe1faff5
6right836b6e25c08d699e08…cd1ddfb9f6
7right5cfacfeb6960aa5e16…21a087e24f
8right23c4f0831b90f59516…a26a59256b
9left3fe0d5d17979ce94c0…bd6b56d925
10left120af2267f3c31cbf3…425e6ed072
11right747f12f58baa04ca90…65cc7dde22
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
03c79c2f42ca9255de2536781df0b75d1aaa59b2e3ec0ffb772f49bf0a8ff52b