DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,411 entries · root 3cf8d092d3e2
ledger/entry 6351‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
4,582.55 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 3.897ms2026-08-05T11:15:42.640Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02mandate scopeclear
03!velocity4582.55 leaves under 20% of the 773860.71 window
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integrityhorizon-submit, 0.4s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integrityremit_tax unchanged since approval

why

spend_windowspend_window_near_cap
4582.55 leaves under 20% of the 773860.71 window

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GA7Y2SGYSBKQNRFY3LO7ON75KAHS5IT5VY36HZPTES267TJXZK66RQ5G
operations
1
op 0 · movement
4582.5506829 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 02e2e4
tool_call (not trusted)
remit_tax(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
horizon-submit · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 7d51f242b56dc315 · signed
clock skew
0.4s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
remit_tax · e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853
tool executing
e665569f96c89c4d9e57a853 · unchanged
policy commitment
6058dd02440be2d1f6193e0a

provenance

mandate hash
0e1c128739a05e8c073cba602543a210dcf6c7d1c61b125454590c2688a041ec
rule hash
6058dd02440be2d1f6193e0ad3933111f6bd39563347707855fa880ccb4fa145
request hash
b8982d3e7acbbccc63364439ed297427adfb89899c699171a4913860f7f09ffc
transaction
39a88495ff3c1f397ace88657cd09fed502ee8900a0979a87d11370fb2fea715

the receipt

entry
6351 of 7411
previous entry
4ab443d194dbe675af55e00a4c0ef99aba623c1070069d068dcf8e290916d0db
leaf hash
a99775894b7f1446b6944b3e0c4806c219f418798a5f3aac7616e69d46144824
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
/ZJ7V4IcSmuT9GP1Tzi5Ms79PlwMstAdPLbtu12rH+BaO2DahfKnJEAOsbhCM5w+V/I54v27coRaZNSKxpNfCA==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 3cf8d092d3…6f96b0
0left4ab443d194dbe675af…290916d0db
1left66212b3574ecde0db8…1d8dca8128
2lefte50497a1f8127a4ce2…0fa6502a42
3leftd0feac8f11892bb13b…9078aeb372
4rightbd33decd87ecd2cc76…79cfcec3f6
5right01e886e3ccc5920d2a…26a9fa3cba
6left2837f0d2fdf056aff2…51733dfe2c
7left281c02aa0e8b3e7d37…dd9f4535ca
8rightf1802e138ad8e1e868…7ccc6953ce
9rightf1501cd5c083126291…586061c99b
10right76e765af0234fcd18e…69b44f14fb
11left4043c82f03366d541c…af7a3fd4fe
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
3cf8d092d3e2ffc8abd2ab26c8eaecb767bc22ccdcd20d476f7c5250e46f96b0