DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,605 entries · root 6ee58a74d219
ledger/entry 3955‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
72,281.87 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 2.573ms2026-07-30T09:28:39.860Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 60d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritympp-relay, 0.7s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritypay_vendor was e1593e906c58… at approval and is e2bd51197260… now

why

post_approval_integritytool_definition_changed
pay_vendor was e1593e906c58… at approval and is e2bd51197260… now

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
72281.8769146 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice bfc890
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 7298ff7b557850d3 · signed
clock skew
0.7s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e2bd511972607f1ef197b894 · changed since approval
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
fad533fdcd5f0729abfebc325d4fa3d5763d50b17be216f80fdaf33dd5bf6a76
transaction
e4fd71c4ff408392360d9dc40581fdf0c7256c4c8f59e83aba9a7094c268ef0f

the receipt

entry
3955 of 7605
previous entry
7e77208ebb6c001167266deea1e5715e9dd2c0e5540df4a66753763622c1f6b4
leaf hash
b426ff752351c0d65d08debcf4bb8801eeccf6ffc60eee3a878858648b2cf364
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
rKQ2p8caufD5lTjDm/ZL17vVu1y69Jp8aHGeDqtO8BncfW3VaRa6JZywrncvjNpSTQ5laAa5+seSm0aBZtdbCQ==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 6ee58a74d2…68fb88
0left7e77208ebb6c001167…3622c1f6b4
1leftb0e4c48dba82e461be…527b9ea070
2right570d54a80cb1c11e40…e6635e198e
3right6743eec2d15a19f834…9d5a5ccb87
4left3126e40c2f489fed7e…8fa24736aa
5leftcf99204246788d9ce7…ed899d5905
6left645738fcda46eccb96…87c433936e
7right38df458c4668a6ad01…4d683ae987
8left29c454556c69d47a2a…2632854b0d
9left1f8bece408d15a8047…f91777f0e3
10left5c0713f6dd12def302…5b7f738edd
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12rightf94083ddd84a996748…afb6b38217
root
6ee58a74d2197b7e76fdc14ddde65f4531fce31c638d4c3f0c3e4e4bca68fb88