DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,341 entries · root 560bf0f5f0d6
ledger/entry 5426‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
2,587.57 USDC tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.169ms2026-08-03T11:08:39.262Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02·mandate scopenot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
03·velocitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integritydelivered over horizon-submit, the mandate names soroban-direct
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

rail_integrityrail_hop_mismatch
delivered over horizon-submit, the mandate names soroban-direct

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GBSDR4ZCBLW5J37XVUSEME44BFA53OHVEAHRKX7JKL6LUFBTMJIO3MJS
operations
1
op 0 · movement
2587.5725096 USDCGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice c567d6
tool_call (not trusted)
settle_invoice(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
horizon-submit · mandate names soroban-direct
envelope
nonce 66883f2a2f3fc4ac · signed
clock skew
-1.4s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
settle_invoice · 00198884d83611502bb48a12
tool executing
00198884d83611502bb48a12 · unchanged
policy commitment
c39b42efb504654abe017035

provenance

mandate hash
ed67197142edb3f44244f205d12962fdb4f0a93bc58d0d94f3b668240548ecbb
rule hash
c39b42efb504654abe0170359ff9924c5ad2161fca8c4b77c28ba9b173888ad5
request hash
a12dff20dd5e21783ac89041fcc3c1e1b091a89769126a34c0ff64399989fc77
transaction
01d6f6a9e9261a43e9756c4d5a795d8ea0cd1551e1b0791c8c9e7e5153cacbc8

the receipt

entry
5426 of 7341
previous entry
f0630ad31031ee9e29e0e5e41f1cbe10f3cca49e57c1911d9546b110c7396ba4
leaf hash
c09e9c452494527d1b02c224d7ef10ebe92f62351f1b2dee9b52836164e478cf
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
E2SSUe7aM6dNrHuhjbYW4JToQSjvC+TxcVHoLBdq6BUlT5sShNQEK3ds2bEVmSfZnfdO9NPaaSoFyOC0IYuABw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 560bf0f5f0…bb115f
0rightb0746bb067a7e483e4…e270ed1c29
1left0cafb4f9e49e402a43…df4dd4a6f8
2right6af150d013f56225d7…6902a0f83b
3right5a4e96981695c9d169…4d66db00b1
4leftdf59d99dd55b45588d…b4ee2ee5fa
5left97eb33c08ded76bf18…0d91deff80
6right56edcb725fc4fa8760…359d9f3a4a
7right5ef8d47092b4a9a9fc…9d71f7af8a
8left4457566ed7240b9466…543dd4c1ea
9rightc1ee5dcce64b8e468a…839a1d2c47
10left120af2267f3c31cbf3…425e6ed072
11rightb29c24f63a25899d26…21a3d78898
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
560bf0f5f0d62ad0ef633bf63bc60afaa05a4ddbd6378798bdf836e783bb115f