DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 8,006 entries · root 776b82dfc9c8
ledger/entry 2215‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
42,835.10 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 2.618ms2026-07-24T13:54:31.891Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04!counterpartydestination was first seen under 24h ago and has no payment history
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritympp-relay, -0.0s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritypay_vendor unchanged since approval

why

counterpartycounterparty_first_seen
destination was first seen under 24h ago and has no payment history

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
42835.1026482 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice bd101c
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
first seen under 24h ago
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce b6033de18b212a7c · signed
clock skew
-0.0s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
25fda17789e8c950179aa2ce3856d073f051a5756c96b2ecc531b5161b2f5ba5
transaction
c2bbf2c9d31609ec0b7ad763240fb62d268cf4cb53ac615f3fad28b0008e7d8f

the receipt

entry
2215 of 8006
previous entry
26ff1e45e090a85f1c81880a1def2cba610910eb50aba295cfbc659c0b985e35
leaf hash
c4f545c18cfcd14807932ac24db4aa089e50d5cabd311182f5533a006cbbd5c1
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
2x6adnzbtTGIw1WmubV4v85AlvPZPr42AVPLBNTmD0Kdga+Jo2mOAaKra96b8GYNeB2MVy1JrHESpSj90iAZCw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 776b82dfc9…036c04
0left26ff1e45e090a85f1c…9c0b985e35
1leftc61e7152ae733209a9…c7a13ff372
2left150297b935c33b7838…cd47cc2343
3right9a6067a889df2118b6…6c5a7853b3
4right12062510c5e1378838…9e75483095
5leftcb5bc3e8d7418c475b…daea27d80e
6right58b1e5f0fb69088c4a…04a24f0797
7left80838e123e3b67694c…002c788183
8right343106862a40792d91…7061efa225
9righte799ad94e5ec8f5b18…1eb984ac76
10rightd0305720808f0f38a5…b7c09f13a2
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12right5887767a06effff1e8…ad87bbcbc5
root
776b82dfc9c8a1c41fa7cdc17109126e493f2c8a1653045d5ac7273874036c04