DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,511 entries · root 25ed7753191d
ledger/entry 3495‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
13,815.75 XLM tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.940ms2026-07-28T18:57:27.456Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02mandate scopeclear
03velocityclear
04!counterpartydestination was first seen under 24h ago and has no payment history
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integritympp-relay, -1.8s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritypay_vendor unchanged since approval

why

counterpartycounterparty_first_seen
destination was first seen under 24h ago and has no payment history

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GC27NDXT4MOALGAT2RWMYHJEH5KBM5NAT4WZCXDNKU2BOWMN4RELXGRP
operations
1
op 0 · movement
13815.7574447 XLMGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice b4f086
tool_call (not trusted)
pay_vendor(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
first seen under 24h ago
rail
mpp-relay · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce 7dfa04af3b2f14f7 · signed
clock skew
-1.8s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
pay_vendor · e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d
tool executing
e1593e906c588f3acdcafb9d · unchanged
policy commitment
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8

provenance

mandate hash
0accd5a31f9eb1c0c68d1584f8fb21ba4741c81466f83864926e86495a075d9e
rule hash
f15db4cb501110bfe44c87d8b96c5a83c92100469691a2f516026584bef2f4a7
request hash
dd3b349439cd34da57f8dc1fd225487a0fb46d8d8899cff6364f6573e9cf544d
transaction
dc1660517d296ba311027a1dfc83910bc23fcf3003ba1a2a7c0316ceb62b1afd

the receipt

entry
3495 of 7511
previous entry
b6a72bc8aca6605fec54977b4a59ea29159a45f30d0f9d5c870774d1caa42ee5
leaf hash
f737c8c330062fff9b694d39ebf1ad9667fcc914fe81380b3436aa8dedf2c437
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
OD3RH/5gWKJdCS/ZeBOmuvvPPm2O83PPAJ1bJ/cmiwg5lyAYPm0xcMwQWdB/nxr/xCOjw5NGWnaKxdfXHHZHAw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 25ed775319…9ff385
0leftb6a72bc8aca6605fec…d1caa42ee5
1left12cb7bd32d1c9479ef…a6b1a82255
2left24bd75d83297e45166…521682dc34
3right0cd35cac7627eb0bed…7fd9cafd83
4right6d7e8e340a9ca2adb4…15dbb40c95
5leftb182e71ec852bb824a…2dfbf98013
6right9608dd77c014568922…e8e799ef5a
7left8bda8489d0293bcd8a…82a2436f94
8left1688c1e4a32a5083fd…4b7c26e6dc
9rightd455e87f03300cd42e…d51b14eb31
10left5c0713f6dd12def302…5b7f738edd
11left41d620122bde1d9fe8…e0f8c70997
12righte3a36fb9f5c7387870…d12edf1fed
root
25ed7753191d0b62eeb6bdcf1de5232ff5128006d463ed1454104a43159ff385