DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,703 entries · root 0bd1f662b6ca
ledger/entry 4421‹ oldernewer ›
DENY
the payment as read off the wire
1,331.00 USDC tidal bandwidth
decided in 1.057ms2026-07-31T14:12:01.234Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01·realitynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
02mandate scopemandate issuer is not in the trusted set
03velocityclear
04·counterpartynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
05·privacynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict
06rail integrityhorizon-submit, 0.9s skew, nonce fresh
07·post approval integritynot reached — an earlier check ended the verdict

why

mandate_authenticitymandate_issuer_untrusted
mandate issuer is not in the trusted set

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GAPTG22HH2Q7G6JYZKIJDCWGI5VNP7SPOS6CCHISM5HSM536M3EQXWDE
operations
1
op 0 · movement
1331.0010035 USDCGBODUHRP5FMOMWB6DT4SV7KDYMUXSNAOGPYJIMJHOB3ARCGWUGLQKMVB
memo (not trusted)
invoice 626477
tool_call (not trusted)
issue_refund(vendor="tidal bandwidth")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
tidal bandwidth · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
60 days
rail
horizon-submit · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce fcfe44384c4ccceb · signed
clock skew
0.9s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
issue_refund · af00cb44f0a0615b89ae21a5
tool executing
af00cb44f0a0615b89ae21a5 · unchanged
policy commitment
feaf0619f08a7e6d9de5189f

provenance

mandate hash
3363a48df38810d7f94266841f5ce9f6943260404031d19f83037ec980296e64
rule hash
feaf0619f08a7e6d9de5189fc4ec6f962d2e71afb0d5df79161417ea73fe17b5
request hash
159191ae4a55090b75fb851d4e302448110931224c40cd8b5f902a7ce9634bcb
transaction
1cd37ffd0208af984c6679b3421c6b86565d665b8ba1589cf44db25bf0506efc

the receipt

entry
4421 of 7703
previous entry
d75efb51dc95171b9e7ae4d706cbaab9842087d0b01011fb5bde1ca5c494ae78
leaf hash
ca7467415be5b1cc6552d89d3db9d98ba937a9258e9df706fa4154c12c57db3c
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
MIyRhQKT/9e3PPoGzipwqOiPEgsqqFqp3t+3Z/YqKVQ/M8PH4I60zHViXv9I3dMp2TSJkKmZj5or/Z41WLIdBg==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root 0bd1f662b6…996b36
0leftd75efb51dc95171b9e…a5c494ae78
1rightf87c98042a2383f9ae…c1b821572b
2left22822b7c9f9d3b4671…0ab632ee20
3right5378a14d6b0d0b2e4c…4bb34fa4a9
4right7b4d3ee32dede78dcf…0a26711f73
5rightf0257c5d3130c146dc…733c7ae82d
6leftb6458fc039c8ebb865…3034f7b359
7right4a9ccd582de0e03557…dbd405a0f3
8left4e4bc411d7266f864e…35a4b2046e
9rightcceadbe3aa211130c6…9fbf263854
10right78d79e50c934cffc8b…2cef11de30
11right59b10b53f6ec7b893c…78b7e19392
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
0bd1f662b6ca3537daf401ef9948620f0f3a20c04d92620de6af12aa34996b36