DETENTexplorer
stellar testnet
synthetic ledgertransactions are simulated · hashes, ed25519 signatures and inclusion proofs are real and recomputed on every pagelog 7,674 entries · root b9e6fe93f230
ledger/entry 4422‹ oldernewer ›
STEP UP
the payment as read off the wire
881,087.60 XLM pixel foundry
decided in 4.606ms2026-07-31T14:19:14.925Znever reached the network

how it was scanned

01realityclear
02!mandate scopeop 0 pays 881087.60, above 80% of the 1031814.27 cap, human approval required
03velocityclear
04counterpartyclear on ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01, first seen 209d ago
05privacy2 annotation fields scanned, nothing sensitive
06rail integrityhorizon-submit, 1.0s skew, nonce fresh
07post approval integritysettle_invoice unchanged since approval

why

mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 881087.60, above 80% of the 1031814.27 cap, human approval required

what the engine read

decoded from the envelope itself. the memo and the tool call are shown because they were ignored — a label is not evidence of what a transaction does.

actor account
GCK2IIIS5G3SIUJPTSSJIC5CSUMLTWZ737DSQTB2KJR63I5XJD47YFOJ
operations
1
op 0 · movement
881087.6034815 XLMGAI32BDAUBEHV7QNDFUCCPAF3MJSIJ7GE4WV2DVK3QJXQDBZUNUJ7GJ6
memo (not trusted)
invoice d81211
tool_call (not trusted)
settle_invoice(vendor="pixel foundry")

what checks four to seven were given

the counterparty feed, the transport envelope and the approval-time snapshot. they are recorded on the entry because a verdict nobody can re-derive is only an assertion.

counterparty
pixel foundry · clean
screened against
ofac sdn + eu csl, 2026-08-01
destination age
209 days
rail
horizon-submit · as the mandate names
envelope
nonce c5aea4ee6f545059 · signed
clock skew
1.0s against a 60s replay window
tool approved
settle_invoice · cf8afbea802e68958853cc09
tool executing
cf8afbea802e68958853cc09 · unchanged
policy commitment
666fffa405f3422198fd9451

provenance

mandate hash
62054781513a89f3a21a0a59406754dbe61fba9c570cf7a9e437c93e2b2292f5
rule hash
666fffa405f3422198fd9451df1674b17ec570e17de6c136b287abe831f35e8d
request hash
5f37e6a3e663fee09fff5daaf1aeab7276248865bcab13ec270f3300110a714f
transaction
6c96c633b9bfe7bbd8247e2b7826a962d693f04a931cd3ab3d52ff50f3d22312

the receipt

entry
4422 of 7674
previous entry
ca7467415be5b1cc6552d89d3db9d98ba937a9258e9df706fa4154c12c57db3c
leaf hash
d807e65d1bdd4640a5af8068b3a786f2c83f5049ec907f608c07ae412eeec9c3
engine key
GC4JH7M7F6TGKHPUTVSA3MZUTWWAXQTNMBJIT5XIB7XHNFKBKNRWPMSC
signature
zmSokaGvZywoM8wc6N9w0bTynhBvqKRap5L/OFotQmYn1aEJsfK7eytGS4W9hkZOh4F63jttH/HQR/XQhuKZDw==

inclusion proof

the leaf was rebuilt from the payload above, the signature checked against the engine key, and the path below walked back to the published root. all three ran when this page was rendered.

leaf rebuilt from payloaded25519 signature validincluded in root b9e6fe93f2…06d661
0right40e0d4ef42f7e54983…80a635fbd8
1leftdecf1d38efebfafb9e…4111fa72e0
2left22822b7c9f9d3b4671…0ab632ee20
3right5378a14d6b0d0b2e4c…4bb34fa4a9
4right7b4d3ee32dede78dcf…0a26711f73
5rightf0257c5d3130c146dc…733c7ae82d
6leftb6458fc039c8ebb865…3034f7b359
7right4a9ccd582de0e03557…dbd405a0f3
8left4e4bc411d7266f864e…35a4b2046e
9rightcceadbe3aa211130c6…9fbf263854
10right78d79e50c934cffc8b…2cef11de30
11right554a3d64c71d4e2ffe…3c0bd44eb5
12leftdc8527842d65829ab0…fb53df942a
root
b9e6fe93f23072e43c6660254a72cee090e6db03ae77cbc72d3d2b393c06d661